Just twenty-four hours after Wired exposed dormant facial recognition code inside Meta’s smart glasses companion app, the tech giant quietly pushed a software update to purge the software. Discovered on June 4, the internal code, dubbed “Name Tag”, was embedded within the core Meta AI application required to pair the wearable hardware to smartphones over Bluetooth. The tool was engineered to convert captured faces into biometric identifiers stored on-device, automatically cross-referencing them with every new facial scan. By June 5, the entire framework was erased.
Read: Siri AI: A deep dive into Apple’s new intelligent assistant
The discovery aligns with a February report from The New York Times indicating Meta was actively developing facial analysis capabilities for its wearables. While “Name Tag” was likely intended as a utility to help users seamlessly recall previously met acquaintances, its existence highlights a deeply invasive technological solution to a standard social dilemma. Most individuals would prefer a forgotten name over having their physical likeness ingested by a face-mounted camera.
Meta’s smart glasses, built in partnership with Luxottica brands like Ray-Ban and Oakley, are already magnetizing privacy controversies. The hardware has faced public backlash over surveillance concerns, ranging from street harassment to physical altercations on transit systems. More severely, Meta was hit with a major class-action lawsuit in March following an investigative report revealing that Kenyan content moderators were tasked with reviewing highly intimate footage captured by the devices, often completely without the wearers’ knowledge.
See also
Meta Vice President of Communications Andy Stone downplayed the code discovery, asserting that the feature was merely a pilot effort and that the company had not made a final decision on a public rollout. However, the fact that developers actively compiled and shipped this architecture into a live product provides cold comfort to privacy advocates. The lightning-fast deletion of the code and subsequent corporate damage control underscore that Meta remains acutely aware of the dangerous ethical tightrope it walks regarding unauthorized public surveillance.
