As 2026 opens, conflict remains a permanent global condition, not an exception. More than 185,000 political violence events were recorded in 2025, directly exposing 831 million people—16% of humanity—to violence. The new year has brought no respite: Venezuela’s government collapsed in a U.S. military operation, Russia deployed hypersonic missiles near Ukraine’s NATO border, and Sudan marked its 1,000th day of war.
Death tolls and displacement figures dominate the headlines. What goes unmeasured is the invisible psychological toll—the systematic traumatization of an entire generation that will outlast the conflicts themselves.
A disproportionate share of that traumatized generation is African. The deadliest conflicts of 2025 spanned multiple continents—from Ukraine to Gaza to Myanmar—but Africa faces compounding damage: it hosts the largest concentration of fragile states, the youngest populations, and the weakest infrastructure to address psychological harm. Two billion people live in fragile settings globally; many of them are in Africa, where 740 million young people will enter working age by 2050. By 2035, more young Africans will join the workforce each year than the rest of the world combined.
The demographic math is unforgiving to the West World. Europe’s hospitals will be short 4.1 million health workers by 2030. Japan’s elder care system is collapsing . Economic forecasts uniformly predict Africa’s youth will fill these gaps. Yet development policy obsesses over job creation while ignoring a more fundamental question: can traumatized workers sustain employment even when jobs exist?
Follow us on WhatsApp | LinkedIn for the latest headlines
The answer, we learned in Somalia, is no—not without intervention.
In our workforce programs across Somalia, we saw 40% of successfully placed apprentices abandon positions within months—not from lack of opportunity, but because untreated trauma made holding jobs psychologically impossible.
The Hidden Burden
In conflict-affected settings, roughly one in four adults shows clinical signs of PTSD. In Nigeria, among populations displaced by Boko Haram, rates reach 64% . In eastern Congo, roughly half of adults meet diagnostic criteria. High-income countries see rates in low single digits.
These figures capture only active conflict zones. They miss intergenerational transmission—conflicts that ended decades ago continue producing trauma symptoms in children who never experienced the violence.
Can Africa build therapeutic infrastructure to treat hundreds of millions? No. Africa has 1.6 mental health workers per 100,000 people. Europe has 44.8. The workforce everyone is counting on is developing with widespread, untreated psychological damage and virtually no capacity to address it.
The Trauma Tax
In Somalia, we saw this firsthand. Over several years, Iftin Global built vocational training across the country where we placed conflict-affected youth with committed employers. Yet dropout rates hit 40% within three months. Employers reported apprentices who stopped showing up after critical feedback, shut down when supervisors spoke sharply, or resigned after routine workplace friction.
We assessed participants and found over a quarter had PTSD. Many had witnessed bombings, lived through displacement, lost family to violence. What employers interpreted as poor work ethic was trauma-related dysregulation—nervous systems operating as if under active threat.
The economic toll can be quantified. In Kenya, mental health conditions are associated with 19.3 million workdays lost annually—$571.8 million in economic cost , almost 1% of GDP. But much of the burden remains invisible. Absenteeism, when workers stay home, is the visible part. The larger cost is presenteeism: workers who show up but cannot function, instead staring at screens, redoing simple tasks and freezing when stressed. In studies focused on post-traumatic stress disorder, productivity loss is estimated at 10 days per year from absenteeism and 33 days from presenteeism—43 days per affected worker.
If Kenya, with 4% of Africa’s workforce, loses this much, the continental toll could approach 400 million workdays annually. These figures capture only the formal economy; most Africans work in informal sectors with zero mental health infrastructure, where losses likely run higher.
This is the trauma tax: a levy on economic output paid through lost days, diminished capacity, and potential that never materializes. It appears in no budget or risk assessment. Translating trauma into lost productivity isn’t callous, it’s strategic. What doesn’t get measured doesn’t get funded.
What Happens When You Treat It
The trauma tax is reversible. Once we understood what we faced in Somalia, we redesigned every program to treat mental health as core infrastructure.
We developed a brief screening tool to identify which participants were carrying trauma and how severely it was undermining their capacity to work—making the invisible visible. Then we embedded a curriculum of evidence-based techniques directly into workforce development from day one. We trained supervisors and peer counselors to deliver it: techniques for calming the nervous system, recognizing trauma responses, distinguishing workplace stress from genuine danger.
Results came within months. Dropout rates fell from 40% to under 10%. One-year retention hit 98%. The integrated approach delivered 4.37x return on investment versus 2.26x for employment-only programs.
The mechanism is consistent: trauma suppresses the exact capabilities work requires—sustained attention, emotional regulation, cognitive flexibility. Address the trauma and those capabilities return.
This pattern holds across contexts. In Colombia , the International Rescue Committee documents higher job retention when mental health support is integrated into refugee economic programs. American apprenticeship programs serving marginalized communities report significantly higher completion rates when mental health resources are included.
What Needs to Happen
Workforce mental health must be treated as productivity infrastructure – as essential as roads or electricity.
The current approach misframes the problem. Mental health competes with malaria and maternal mortality for limited health resources. It receives a fraction of spending, delivered through clinics that barely exist. Meanwhile, economic damage compounds daily.
The objection is obvious: isn’t job creation the real constraint? With 11 million young Africans seeking work annually while only 3 million formal jobs are created , why focus on readiness or mental health ?
Sign up for free AllAfrica Newsletters
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
Because the constraints are interdependent. Creating jobs while ignoring trauma means positions become revolving doors. In Somalia, addressing both simultaneously—embedding trauma support into job placement—dropped failure rates from 40% to under 10%. Development has spent decades on the jobs side while remaining blind to readiness. That asymmetry must correct.
The solution is to embed mental health into systems already reaching workers such as vocational training, apprenticeships and onboarding. This makes it foundational infrastructure, not optional wellness. This doesn’t require psychiatrists. Task-shifting works as we train supervisors and peer counselors to deliver basic support, as proven in Zimbabwe’s Friendship Bench and Uganda’s StrongMinds.
The Window
The demographic window is open now, and closing fast. If Africa’s emerging workforce arrives unable to sustain employment, consequences compound for decades: dangerous migration, social instability, wasted investment, and the demographic dividend transforms into demographic crisis.
The mechanisms to eliminate the trauma tax exist. The question is whether they get built before the opportunity passes—or whether a generation trained for work they cannot sustain becomes locked in.
Mohamed Ali Diini, founder of Iftin Global and winner of the 2025 John P. McNulty Prize, pioneered the concept of “The Trauma Tax” and has demonstrated that healing trauma is essential economic infrastructure; his work has been featured in The New York Times, TIME, and The Guardian.
